Petition for review after affirmance of order denying motion to compel arbitration. If an arbitration agreement provides that disputes will be resolved under the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.; the FAA), do the FAA’s substantive provisions apply and preempt inconsistent state laws regardless of whether interstate commerce is involved? Review granted/brief due.
Blunt v. Town of Gilbert (9th Cir. 24-3538 4/3/26) Retroactivity | AZ POBOR
This case raises the issue of whether Arizona’s presumption against retroactivity prohibits application of a 2022 amendment to the Arizona Peace Officers Bill of Rights
There are 0 comments