Cash v. County of Los Angeles, 111 Cal. App. 5th 741 (2025), review granted, 2025 WL 2414150 (Mem) (Aug. 20, 2025); S291827/B336980 FEHA | Attorneys’ Fees – Employment Law Weekly

Cash v. County of Los Angeles, 111 Cal. App. 5th 741 (2025), review granted, 2025 WL 2414150 (Mem) (Aug. 20, 2025); S291827/B336980 FEHA | Attorneys’ Fees

Phyllis W. Cheng, Esq.

ADR Services Mediator, Former Director of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”)

August 20, 2025

Review granted after affirmance of post-judgment orders. (1) Did the trial court’s across-the-board reduction of the fees requested by plaintiff’s counsel trigger heightened scrutiny of its fee order on appeal? (2) Did the trial court commit reversible error in reducing the fee request on an across-the-board basis? Review granted/brief due.

Court of Appeal Decision

There are 0 comments

Share:

More Posts

Clear and Unmistakable Evidence is Words in the Arbitration Agreement

Plaintiff Carlos Villalobos was employed by Simplified Labor Staffing Solutions, Inc., a temporary staffing services company that supplies labor and staffing to its customers. Simplified Staffing

Bills Signed by Governor (10/7/25)

AB 715 by Assemblymember Rick Chavez Zbur (D-Hollywood) — Educational equity: discrimination: antisemitism prevention (signing message) SB 48 by Senator Lena Gonzalez (D-Los Angeles) –

Bills Signed and Vetoed by Governor (10/6/25)

Signed: AB 499 by Assemblymember Liz Ortega (D-San Leandro) – Robert F. Kennedy Farm Workers Medical Plan AB 606 by Assemblymember Sharon Quirk-Silva (D-Fullerton) –

Villalobos v. Maersk, Inc. (CA2/8 B333556 10/6/25) Arbitrability

“Under California law, it is presumed the judge will decide arbitrability, unless there is clear and unmistakable evidence the parties intended the arbitrator to decide

Send Us A Message