Cash v. County of Los Angeles, 111 Cal. App. 5th 741 (2025), review granted, 2025 WL 2414150 (Mem) (Aug. 20, 2025); S291827/B336980 FEHA | Attorneys’ Fees – Employment Law Weekly

Cash v. County of Los Angeles, 111 Cal. App. 5th 741 (2025), review granted, 2025 WL 2414150 (Mem) (Aug. 20, 2025); S291827/B336980 FEHA | Attorneys’ Fees

Phyllis W. Cheng, Esq.

ADR Services Mediator, Former Director of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”)

August 20, 2025

Review granted after affirmance of post-judgment orders. (1) Did the trial court’s across-the-board reduction of the fees requested by plaintiff’s counsel trigger heightened scrutiny of its fee order on appeal? (2) Did the trial court commit reversible error in reducing the fee request on an across-the-board basis? Review granted/brief due.

Court of Appeal Decision

There are 0 comments

Share:

More Posts

Supreme Court Hohenshelt Ruling Gains Traction in Pending Cases

In April 2021, John Goshorn hired Aqua Blue Construction, Inc. to build a swimming pool, spa, and barbeque at his home for $109,475. Aqua Blue

City of Los Angeles Prevails in City Attorney Discrimination Case

Karen Majovski is a deputy city attorney (DCA) in the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office. The office uses a classification system – DCA-I through DCA-IV

AI Is Not A Lawyer – and No Attorney-Client Privilege Applies

Generative artificial intelligence tools have become increasingly prevalent across various domains of human activity. It has reliably been estimated, for instance that more than half of

Employers Should Address New Postal Service “Postmark” Rule

The Postal Service added a new section (DMM 608.11) to the Domestic Mail Manual that formally defines the postmark for the first time in a regulation and

Send Us A Message