Cash v. County of Los Angeles, 111 Cal. App. 5th 741 (2025), review granted, 2025 WL 2414150 (Mem) (Aug. 20, 2025); S291827/B336980 FEHA | Attorneys’ Fees – Employment Law Weekly

Cash v. County of Los Angeles, 111 Cal. App. 5th 741 (2025), review granted, 2025 WL 2414150 (Mem) (Aug. 20, 2025); S291827/B336980 FEHA | Attorneys’ Fees

Phyllis W. Cheng, Esq.

ADR Services Mediator, Former Director of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”)

August 20, 2025

Review granted after affirmance of post-judgment orders. (1) Did the trial court’s across-the-board reduction of the fees requested by plaintiff’s counsel trigger heightened scrutiny of its fee order on appeal? (2) Did the trial court commit reversible error in reducing the fee request on an across-the-board basis? Review granted/brief due.

Court of Appeal Decision

There are 0 comments

Share:

More Posts

Chaudhry v. State of Cal. (CA1/4 A173501 9/28/26) Labor Code section 1102.5 | Individual Supervisors

Plaintiff Farzana Chaudhry appeals after the trial court granted judgment on the pleadings for the State of California; Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR); and

Diemert v. City of Seattle (9th Cir. 25-1188 9/28/26) Title VII and Washington Law Against Discrimination | Racial Harassment

The panel affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the City of Seattle in Joshua Diemert’s action

Bills Signed and Vetoed by Governor (9/27/26)

Signed: AB 1198 by Assemblymember Matt Haney (D-San Francisco) — Public works: prevailing wages AB 1534 by Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin (D-Thousand Oaks) — Federal Workforce

Ridings v. PeaceHealth (9th Cir. 24-7282 9/24/26) Title VII Religious Discrimination | Failure to Accommodate

The panel reversed the district court’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of Karly Ridings’s employment discrimination action against PeaceHealth, alleging a failure to accommodate

Send Us A Message