Cash v. County of Los Angeles, 111 Cal. App. 5th 741 (2025), review granted, 2025 WL 2414150 (Mem) (Aug. 20, 2025); S291827/B336980 FEHA | Attorneys’ Fees – Employment Law Weekly

Cash v. County of Los Angeles, 111 Cal. App. 5th 741 (2025), review granted, 2025 WL 2414150 (Mem) (Aug. 20, 2025); S291827/B336980 FEHA | Attorneys’ Fees

Phyllis W. Cheng, Esq.

ADR Services Mediator, Former Director of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”)

August 20, 2025

Review granted after affirmance of post-judgment orders. (1) Did the trial court’s across-the-board reduction of the fees requested by plaintiff’s counsel trigger heightened scrutiny of its fee order on appeal? (2) Did the trial court commit reversible error in reducing the fee request on an across-the-board basis? Review granted/brief due.

Court of Appeal Decision

There are 0 comments

Share:

More Posts

County of L.A. v. Niblett (CA2/1 B327744 filed 10/31/25, part. pub. 11/26/25) Workplace Violence Restraining Order | AI Misuse

This is an appeal from a three-year workplace violence restraining order (WVRO) issued pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.8 that protects nonparty Samuel

Wonderful Nurseries v. ALRB (CA5 F088515 11/25/25) ALRB

In early 2024, the United Farmworkers of America (UFW) sought to be certified as the exclusive bargaining representative for the employees of Wonderful Nurseries, LLC

Gessele v. Jack in the Box Inc. (9th Cir. 23-2522, 23-2527 11/25/25) Oregon Wage and Hour

The panel reversed in part and affirmed in part the district court’s judgment in a wage-and-hour case brought by plaintiffs against their former employer, Jack

Roe v. Smith (CA2/2 B344378 11/21/25) Pseudonyms for Parties (rule in DFEH v. Superior Court (2022) 82 Cal.App.5th 105 applied)

Movant First Amendment Coalition (the Coalition) appeals the trial court’s order granting plaintiffs’ motion to proceed under pseudonyms. We conclude the trial court erred in

Send Us A Message