Roe v. Smith (CA2/2 B344378 11/21/25) Pseudonyms for Parties (rule in DFEH v. Superior Court (2022) 82 Cal.App.5th 105 applied) – Employment Law Weekly

Roe v. Smith (CA2/2 B344378 11/21/25) Pseudonyms for Parties (rule in DFEH v. Superior Court (2022) 82 Cal.App.5th 105 applied)

Phyllis W. Cheng, Esq.

ADR Services Mediator, Former Director of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”)

November 21, 2025

Movant First Amendment Coalition (the Coalition) appeals the trial court’s order granting plaintiffs’ motion to proceed under pseudonyms. We conclude the trial court erred in its balancing of the public’s interest in court access. Accordingly, we reverse the order as to plaintiffs.

https://www4.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B344378.PDF

There are 0 comments

Share:

More Posts

Spilman v. The Salvation Army (CA1/5 A169279 1/6/26) Non-Profit Volunteer | Wage and Hour

Plaintiffs Justin Spilman, Teresa Chase, and Jacob Tyler (collectively “Spilman”) worked full time for the Salvation Army, a nonprofit organization, in various operations that supported

Union Gospel Mission of Yakima v. Brown (9th Cir. 24-7246 1/6/26) Washington Anti-Discrimination Law | Hiring Preference for Co-Religionists for Non-Ministerial Roles

The panel affirmed the district court’s preliminary injunction prohibiting the enforcement of the Washington Law Against Discrimination (“WLAD”) against the Union Gospel Mission of Yakima,

NV Resort Ass’n-Int’l All. V. JB Viva Vegas (9th Cir. 24-2791 & 24-3047 1/6/26) Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act

The panel reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Nevada Resort Association-International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture

Sierra Pacific Industries Wage and Hour Cases (CA3 C099436M, filed 12/9/25, mod. & rehrng. denied 1/6/26) Arbitration

THE COURT: It is ordered that the published opinion filed herein on December 9, 2025, be modified as follows: On January 31, 2022, the trial

Send Us A Message