Taduran v. Glidewell James R. Glidewell, Dental Ceramics, 121 Cal.App.5th 197 (2026), review granted 2026 WL 2603782 (mem.) (Sept. 2, 2026); S297762/G064718 – Employment Law Weekly

Taduran v. Glidewell James R. Glidewell, Dental Ceramics, 121 Cal.App.5th 197 (2026), review granted 2026 WL 2603782 (mem.) (Sept. 2, 2026); S297762/G064718

Phyllis W. Cheng, Esq.

ADR Services Mediator, Former Director of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”)

September 14, 2026

Review granted after affirmance of judgment. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of related issues in Cash v. County of Los Angeles, S291827 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court. Review granted/holding for lead case.

Court of Appeal Decision

There are 0 comments

Share:

More Posts

Cal/OSHA Cites Employers $212,500 for Fatal Tunnel Collapse

Cal/OSHA has proposed $212,500 in penalties against two employers — the tunneling contractor and the engineering firm that designed the project — after an April

Walmart Settles Single Store Heat-Recovery/PAGA Case for $400K

A federal judge in San Diego has preliminarily approved a $400,000 class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) settlement resolving claims that Walmart failed to

Cruz v. City of Hermosa Beach (CA2/5 B343086 part. pub. 10/15/26) COVID-19 | Religious Exemption

Defendants City of Hermosa Beach (the City) and the Hermosa Beach Police Department terminated plaintiff Jonathan Cruz from his employment after they implemented a COVID-19

McInerney v. Regents of the Univ. of California (CA2/2 B339467, filed 9/18/26, pub. 10/13/26) FEHA | Fair Chance Act

John “Jack” McInerney (appellant) appeals from a judgment entered against him on his claims against the Regents of the University of California through the University

Send Us A Message