Taduran v. Glidewell James R. Glidewell, Dental Ceramics, 121 Cal.App.5th 197 (2026), review granted 2026 WL 2603782 (mem.) (Sept. 2, 2026); S297762/G064718 – Employment Law Weekly

Taduran v. Glidewell James R. Glidewell, Dental Ceramics, 121 Cal.App.5th 197 (2026), review granted 2026 WL 2603782 (mem.) (Sept. 2, 2026); S297762/G064718

Phyllis W. Cheng, Esq.

ADR Services Mediator, Former Director of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”)

September 14, 2026

Review granted after affirmance of judgment. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of related issues in Cash v. County of Los Angeles, S291827 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court. Review granted/holding for lead case.

Docket

Court of Appeal Decision

Szewczyk v. Orange County Employees Retirement System (CA4/3 G065386, filed 8/14/26, pub. 9/14/26) County Employees Retirement Law

Pursuant to the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (Gov. Code, § 31450 et seq.) (CERL), a County of Orange (County) employee receives a pension

Taduran v. Glidewell James R. Glidewell, Dental Ceramics, 121 Cal.App.5th 197 (2026), review granted 2026 WL 2603782 (mem.) (Sept. 2, 2026); S297762/G064718

Phyllis W. Cheng, Esq.

There are 0 comments

Share:

More Posts

6 BART Employees Recover $7.8M in FEHA Case

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act Requires VA to House Veterans

Bill Signed by Governor (9/14/26)

Szewczyk v. Orange County Employees Retirement System (CA4/3 G065386, filed 8/14/26, pub. 9/14/26) County Employees Retirement Law

Send Us A Message