Taduran v. James R. Glidewell, Dental Ceramics (CA4/3 G064718M mod. 7/1/26) Labor Code Violations | Attorney’s Fees Negative Multiplier – Employment Law Weekly

Taduran v. James R. Glidewell, Dental Ceramics (CA4/3 G064718M mod. 7/1/26) Labor Code Violations | Attorney’s Fees Negative Multiplier

It is hereby ordered that the opinion filed herein on May 26, 2026, is hereby MODIFIED as follows:

On page 8, second full paragraph, first sentence, replace, “On May 30, 2017” with, “On May 3, 2024.”

On page 9, first full paragraph, replace: “Taduran contingency risk for ‘a case that has lasted seven years, involving over 1,500 attorney hours and nearly $100,000 in actual out-of-pocket litigations costs.’” with     “Taduran contended the 1.5 multiplier was appropriate based on the contingency risk for ‘a case that has lasted seven years, involving over 1,500 attorney hours and nearly $100,000 in actual put-of-pocket litigations costs.’”

This modification does not change the judgment. 

https://www4.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/G064718M.PDF

There are 0 comments

Share:

More Posts

Send Us A Message

Skip to content