Osuna v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc., 111 Cal.App.5th 516 (2025), review granted, 2025 WL 2167312 (July 30, 2025) S291614/B338047 – Employment Law Weekly

Osuna v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc., 111 Cal.App.5th 516 (2025), review granted, 2025 WL 2167312 (July 30, 2025) S291614/B338047

Phyllis W. Cheng, Esq.

ADR Services Mediator, Former Director of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”)

August 6, 2025

Petition for review after reversal and remand of order sustaining demurrer without leave to amend. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of related issues in Leeper v. Shipt, S289305 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Review granted/holding for lead case.

Court of Appeal Decision

There are 0 comments

Share:

More Posts

Supreme Court Hohenshelt Ruling Gains Traction in Pending Cases

In April 2021, John Goshorn hired Aqua Blue Construction, Inc. to build a swimming pool, spa, and barbeque at his home for $109,475. Aqua Blue

City of Los Angeles Prevails in City Attorney Discrimination Case

Karen Majovski is a deputy city attorney (DCA) in the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office. The office uses a classification system – DCA-I through DCA-IV

AI Is Not A Lawyer – and No Attorney-Client Privilege Applies

Generative artificial intelligence tools have become increasingly prevalent across various domains of human activity. It has reliably been estimated, for instance that more than half of

Employers Should Address New Postal Service “Postmark” Rule

The Postal Service added a new section (DMM 608.11) to the Domestic Mail Manual that formally defines the postmark for the first time in a regulation and

Send Us A Message